There is an ongoing debate in the sociology of collective action on the function of difference—often measured as group diversity—in mobilization. While some scholarship suggests that difference is often an impediment to collective action, other research finds that activisms attuned to difference can produce more flexible mobilization capable of tackling converging oppressions. To understand the meanings and negotiations of difference in collective action, this article examines how Latinx feminists do intersectionality in the movement for reproductive justice (RJ). Drawing on three years of ethnographic observations and in-depth interviews with a Latina/x reproductive justice organization in California, I argue that staff of the organization engage in contextual, relational, and cultural shift practices that together create a fluid sensibility, what I term “politicmaking,” focused on negotiating difference as a necessarily fraught and messy endeavor. The “politicmaking” of movement actors suggests the need to reexamine the role of difference in collective action.

集体行动社会学对动员中的差异（通常以群体多样性衡量）的功能进行了辩论。尽管一些学者认为差异常常是集体行动的障碍，但其他研究发现，适应差异的行动主义可以产生更灵活的动员能力，以应对不断加剧的压迫。为了理解集体行动中差异的含义和协商，本文考察了拉丁裔女权主义者如何在生殖正义运动（RJ）中实现交叉性。凭借三年的人种学观察和对加利福尼亚州Latina / x生殖正义组织的深入采访，我认为该组织的工作人员会进行情境，关系和文化转变实践，共同创造出一种流动的敏感性，我所说的“政治制定”，重点是谈判差异，这是必然充满烦恼和混乱的努力。运动参与者的“政治决策”表明有必要重新审视差异在集体行动中的作用。