Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to study the relevance of heritage collections and the convergence of methodologies and standards traditionally linked to Library and Information Science (LIS) in the development of digital humanities (DH) research in Spain.

Design/methodology/approach

This paper is based on a systematic review of scientific publications that are representative of DH in Spain and were published between 2013 and 2018. The analysis considered doctoral theses, journal articles and conference papers.

Findings

The results highlight the synergies between documentary heritage, LIS and DH. However, it appears that there is a scarcity of scientific literature to support the confluence of LIS and DH and a limited formal connection between heritage institutions and the areas of academia that reuse and enrich these source collections.

Research limitations/implications

The review of representative scholarly DH publications was mainly based on the metadata that describe the content of articles, thesis and conference papers. This work relies on the thematic indexing (descriptors and keywords) of the analysed documents but their level of quality and consistency is very diverse.

Originality/value

The topic of the study has not been explored before and this work could contribute to the international debate on the interrelation and complementarity between LIS and DH. In addition, this paper shows the contribution that standards and documentary methodologies make to projects in which technology is applied to humanities disciplines. The authors propose that there is an urgent need to strengthen the “scientific relationships” between heritage institutions, as well as enhancing links between the academic field of DH and LIS in order to improve teaching and research strategies in conjunction.

中文翻译：

---

西班牙图书馆与信息科学与数字人文科学的融合。方法，标准和馆藏

目的

本文的目的是研究在西班牙发展数字人文（DH）研究中，遗产收藏的相关性以及传统上与图书馆和情报学（LIS）相关的方法和标准的融合。

设计/方法/方法

本文基于对代表DH的西班牙科学出版物的系统综述，并于2013年至2018年之间发表。该分析考虑了博士论文，期刊论文和会议论文。

发现

结果突出了文献遗产，LIS和DH之间的协同作用。但是，似乎缺乏科学的文献来支持LIS和DH的融合，并且遗产机构与重新使用和丰富这些资源集合的学术界与学术界之间的正式联系有限。

研究局限/意义

DH代表性学术出版物的审查主要基于描述文章，论文和会议论文内容的元数据。这项工作依赖于所分析文档的主题索引（描述符和关键字），但是它们的质量和一致性级别非常不同。

创意/价值

这项研究的主题以前没有被探讨过，这项工作可能会促进有关LIS和DH之间相互关系和互补性的国际辩论。此外，本文还展示了标准和文献方法对将技术应用于人文学科的项目的贡献。作者提出，迫切需要加强遗产机构之间的“科学关系”，并加强卫生署和LIS的学术领域之间的联系，以共同改善教学和研究策略。