Right-wing populism advances a brand of communicative politics that are antithetical to Paulo Freire’s vision of liberating, critical, and participatory communication. This essential opposition helps to understand why the Bolsonaro government has turned Freire into a target of criticisms, as part of its ambitious, furious attempt to remove progressive politics and human rights advances from Brazilian society. Considering the current situation, the purpose of this paper is to examine the relevance of Freire’s ideas for the analysis of the politics of hope against populism. His principles of public criticism, dialogue, autonomous participation, humanism, and hope are antithetical to populism’s vision. The unfolding of both dialogic and expressive politics against populism in Brazil and elsewhere illustrate the significance of Freire’s arguments, and raise questions about the limitations of purely dialogic strategies to confront authoritarianism.

中文翻译：

---

为什么保罗弗莱雷是右翼民粹主义的威胁：希望交流的教训

右翼民粹主义推动了一种传播政治，这与保罗·弗莱雷 (Paulo Freire) 的解放、批判性和参与性传播的愿景背道而驰。这种基本的反对有助于理解为什么博尔索纳罗政府将弗莱雷变成了批评的目标，这是其雄心勃勃、狂暴的企图从巴西社会中消除进步政治和人权进步的一部分。考虑到目前的情况，本文的目的是检验弗莱雷的思想对分析反对民粹主义的希望政治的相关性。他的公众批评、对话、自主参与、人道主义和希望的原则与民粹主义的愿景背道而驰。巴西和其他地方反对民粹主义的对话和表达政治的展开说明了弗莱雷论点的重要性，