Since the publication of the 2007 manifesto ‘Pour une littérature-monde en français’, scholars have questioned whether or not the initially inflammatory concept of littérature-monde has produced a meaningful legacy. This article re-examines the controversies which the manifesto provoked by focusing on the intellectual career of one of its principal authors: Michel Le Bris. Scholarly criticism has largely overlooked the fact that Le Bris’s involvement in the littérature-monde project is an extension of his previous involvement with Maoism and his identity as a Breton author. The manifesto can be read as Le Bris’s response to the political and cultural crises of his time which he previously addressed through activism and cultural entrepreneurship. Though Le Bris’s own defence of the manifesto is flawed and problematic, a better understanding of the context from which it originated raises important questions when considering the role of regional and minority literatures in the global age.

自从2007年发表宣言“法国的法尔蒙大街”以来，学者们一直在质疑最初的煽动性的法尔蒙蒂蒙娜蒂娜是否产生了有意义的遗产。本文通过重新审视宣言的主要作者之一米歇尔·勒布里斯（Michel Le Bris）的知识生涯，引发了争议。学术批评在很大程度上忽略了一个事实，即乐变的Bris在参与littérature，隶该项目是他以前参与毛主义及其作为布列塔尼作家的身份的延伸。宣言可以理解为勒布里斯对他当时的政治和文化危机的回应，他先前通过行动主义和文化企业家精神来应对。尽管勒布里斯自己对宣言的辩护是有缺陷和有问题的，但是在考虑地区和少数民族文学在全球时代的作用时，对它起源的背景的更好理解提出了重要的问题。