In this collectively written article, the authors interrogate contemporary power constellations that run between control and connectivity. Regimes of individualism, hierarchies of assumed classifications and imperialistic subjectivities sustain the basis for political control that organises connections and divisions used to justify hierarchical dominations and distributions. This makes anti-oppression practices that value differing forms of connectivity and intra-dependence (between humans, more than humans, disciplines, all things considered to be of different bodies) nearly unimaginable. The authors offer/reconfigure/understand connectivity as a practice acting in and at odds with those controlling political regimes that organise and classify matter(s), while experimenting with their own writing methodology aimed at staying connected. Informed by new materialist feminist practices and ideas, the authors discuss the political stakes of multiple ideas of connectivity within three empirical scenarios: academic labour practices, social media and a digitally established mutual aid community. We trace entangled forces of separation and control shaped by global imperialism, processes of individuation and technological apparatuses and how they perform within these scenarios. This approach is mirrored in our practice of writing together. In an alternative to traditionalised ways of writing, we expand upon an embodied praxis, elaborating on multiple engagements while offering our own connections with these differing situated knowledges. In light of this, the authors write in a diffractive, collective fashion that lies somewhere between a conversation and the strict linearity of typical narratives.

中文翻译：

---

控制时期的连通性：写入/撤消/拆包/表演电源性能

在这篇集体撰写的文章中，作者询问了在控制和连接之间运行的当代权力星座。个人主义制度、假定分类的等级制度和帝国主义主观性维持了政治控制的基础，政治控制组织了用于证明等级统治和分配合理化的联系和分裂。这使得重视不同形式的连通性和内部依赖（人类之间，而不是人类、学科、所有被认为属于不同身体的事物）的反压迫实践几乎不可想象。作者提供/重新配置/理解连通性作为一种实践，与那些对事物进行组织和分类的控制性政治体制相悖，同时试验他们自己的写作方法，旨在保持联系。在新的唯物主义女权主义实践和思想的启发下，作者在三个经验场景中讨论了多种连通性思想的政治风险：学术劳工实践、社交媒体和数字建立的互助社区。我们追踪由全球帝国主义塑造的分离和控制的纠缠力量、个体化过程和技术装置，以及它们在这些场景中的表现。这种方法反映在我们一起写作的实践中。作为传统写作方式的替代方案，我们扩展了一种具体化的实践，详细阐述了多种参与方式，同时提供了我们自己与这些不同情境知识的联系。有鉴于此，作者在一篇衍射文章中写道，