当前位置: X-MOL 学术Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
General and specific perceptions of procedural justice: Factors associated with perceptions of police and court responses to domestic and family violence
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology Pub Date : 2020-06-29 , DOI: 10.1177/0004865820935941
Silke Meyer 1, 2, 3 , Harley Williamson 3
Affiliation  

Improving criminal justice responses to domestic and family violence is a key focus within many policy and practice reforms. The efficacy of police and court responses to domestic and family violence is central because of the role of police as first responders and courts in issuing protection orders, imposing sanctions and ensuring perpetrator cooperation and accountability. To promote compliance and satisfaction with criminal justice outcomes, a large body of research points to the role of procedural justice. This study draws on survey and administrative data from an Australian jurisdiction to examine perceptions of procedural justice in specific domestic and family violence-related encounters. Findings and implications for policy and practice are discussed.

中文翻译:

对程序正义的一般和具体看法:与警察和法院对家庭暴力的反应看法相关的因素

改进针对家庭暴力的刑事司法对策是许多政策和实践改革的重点。由于警察作为第一响应者和法院在发布保护令、实施制裁和确保肇事者合作和问责方面的作用,警察和法院应对家庭暴力的效力至关重要。为了促进对刑事司法结果的遵守和满意度,大量研究指出了程序正义的作用。本研究利用来自澳大利亚司法管辖区的调查和行政数据来检验对特定家庭暴力相关遭遇中程序正义的看法。讨论了研究结果和对政策和实践的影响。
更新日期:2020-06-29
down
wechat
bug