The evolution of Ferdinando Galiani’s thought toward social mathematic has been neglected by scholars, and his attempt to establish political arguments on the analytical basis remains unexplored. The non-systematic nature of Galiani’s intuitions, due to his laziness, largely justifies this underestimation of his scientific program. This paper intends to show that the mature abbé Galiani follows an intellectual itinerary autonomous and parallel to that followed by Marquis de Condorcet in the same years. The anti-Physiocratique querelle represents Galiani’s methodological maturation. In contrast with Physiocratic economic doctrine, based on the primacy of deductive methodology, Galiani claims for economic science the realism of circumstance against aprioristic axiomatic hypotheses and rationalist generalizations. Galiani’s project, substantially similar to Marquis de Condorcet’s approach to social science, can be defined as Newtonian social mathematics opposed to Physiocratic Cartesian social mathematics.

中文翻译：

---

费尔迪南多·加利亚尼的牛顿社会数学

费迪南多·加利亚尼的社会数学思想的演变一直被学者们所忽视，他在分析基础上建立政治论点的尝试仍未得到探索。由于他的懒惰，加利亚尼直觉的非系统性在很大程度上证明了对他的科学计划的低估。本文旨在表明，成熟的 abbé Galiani 遵循与同年 Marquis de Condorcet 所遵循的自主和平行的知识路线。反重农学派代表了加利亚尼方法论的成熟。与重农经济学学说相反，加利亚尼基于演绎方法论的首要地位，为经济科学主张环境的现实主义，反对先验的公理假设和理性主义的概括。加利亚尼的项目，