Why did the English Nonjuror Richard Rawlinson promote the 1729–30 English translation of Pietro Giannone's Civil History of Naples? The Nonjurors in England espoused ecclesiastical independency from the state, which they derived from the thought of Restoration High Churchmen and from the French Gallican Louis Ellies Du Pin. Giannone, a Neapolitan lawyer, proposed a similar “two powers” model of strict autonomy for both church and state. Giannone's concept was later rejected by enlightened writers like Viscount Bolingbroke and Edward Gibbon, who associated it with high church prejudices. It was defended by the Dissenter Joseph Priestley, who combined it with his own theory of religious sociability. The impact of Giannone on the Nonjurors and on Priestley illuminates the complex religious background to what is often seen as a fundamentally secular doctrine: the separation of church and state.

中文翻译：

---

Pietro Giannone 和对政教分离的非伤害性贡献

为什么英国非陪审员理查德·罗林森 (Richard Rawlinson) 提倡 1729-30 年彼得罗·贾诺内 (Pietro Giannane) 的那不勒斯民史的英文翻译？英格兰的非陪审员支持教会独立于国家，他们源于复兴高级教士的思想和法国高卢人路易斯·埃利斯·杜平的思想。那不勒斯律师詹诺内提出了一种类似的“双权”模式，即教会和国家都严格自治。詹诺内的概念后来被博林布鲁克子爵和爱德华吉本等开明作家拒绝，他们将其与高教会的偏见联系在一起。异议者约瑟夫·普里斯特利（Joseph Priestley）为它辩护，他将其与他自己的宗教社交理论相结合。