Abstract Since its inception in 2007, Springshare's LibGuides has become a popular content management system (CMS) with academic libraries. The challenges of managing LibGuides content through a cohesive content strategy have not been well documented. The researchers conducted a survey of academic libraries that were using the LibGuides platform in Fall 2019 to determine how institutions are managing content challenges. Of 120 respondents, only 53% of the respondents indicated that their institutions had content guidelines that LibGuides authors were expected to follow. The top three most observed elements of these content guidelines were page design (80%), content reuse policies (77%), naming conventions (73%), and navigation (3%). 15% of respondents' institutions did not review guides once they were published. Of those that reviewed guides post-publication, authors (84%) most frequently reviewed their own guides. These findings imply that LibGuides are largely cared for on an honour system. Guidelines tend towards quantifiable elements and omit more abstract concepts.

中文翻译：

---

LibGuides 中的内容策略：一项探索性研究

摘要 Springshare 的 LibGuides 自 2007 年推出以来，已成为学术图书馆流行的内容管理系统 (CMS)。通过有凝聚力的内容策略管理 LibGuides 内容的挑战尚未得到很好的记录。研究人员对 2019 年秋季使用 LibGuides 平台的学术图书馆进行了一项调查，以确定机构如何管理内容挑战。在 120 名受访者中，只有 53% 的受访者表示他们的机构拥有 LibGuides 作者应该遵循的内容指南。这些内容指南中最受关注的前三个元素是页面设计 (80%)、内容重用策略 (77%)、命名约定 (73%) 和导航 (3%)。15% 的受访者所在的机构在指南发布后没有对其进行审查。在出版后审查指南的人中，作者 (84%) 最常审查他们自己的指南。这些发现意味着 LibGuides 在很大程度上受到荣誉系统的照顾。指南倾向于可量化的元素并省略更抽象的概念。