Abstract

This article analyzes counterterrorism (CT) measures that have been developed and implemented since the 2002 Bali attacks, paying special attention to the presidencies of Yudhoyono and Widodo. On the basis of anti-terrorism concepts, current findings of anti-terrorism research will be applied to the case of Indonesia, whereby we will distinguish between reactive and preventive measures and will show how they interact. Here, the revision of existing anti-terror laws carried out by the Indonesian Parliament in May 2018 will receive particular attention. As will be documented, in spite of the initially quite promising short-term effects of CT measures, the already strained relationship between the police and the military regarding jurisdiction has become even more critical in recent years. Since only a few religious or civil authorities have been included to a large extent in attempts to prevent terrorism, these measures are not likely to be as effective and lasting as they might have been.

摘要

本文分析了已制定并实施了自2002年巴厘岛袭击事件，特别关注尤多约诺和维多多的总统任期反恐（CT）的措施。根据反恐怖主义的概念，反恐怖主义研究的最新结果将适用于印度尼西亚的案例，从而我们将区分反应性和预防性措施，并说明它们如何相互作用。在这里，印度尼西亚议会于2018年5月对现行反恐法律进行的修订将受到特别关注。可以证明的是，尽管反恐措施最初具有相当可喜的短期效果，但近年来，警察和军方之间关于管辖权的紧张关系变得更为关键。