ABSTRACT Marching in public, as members of a public meant to be seen in public, has been one of the most frequently deployed forms of collective social protest in the United States. For people with disabilities, however, this type of rhetorical action is fraught with normative assumptions that go beyond presumed needs for accommodation, access, and alternative modes of participation. This essay identifies the far less visible constraints created by previous historic and rhetorical practices, including some of the discourse of other progressive social activists. Both the prospect and the practice of marching as a rhetorical form of performative public argument are thus complex for people with disabilities who are too often not seen as equal citizens. The trouble with marching is thus ableism and its sustained invisibility.

中文翻译：

---

行军的麻烦：残障人士的能力、能见度和排斥

摘要 在公共场合游行，作为旨在在公共场合出现的公众成员，一直是美国最常见的集体社会抗议形式之一。然而，对于残疾人来说，这种修辞行为充满了规范性假设，超出了对住宿、访问和替代参与模式的假定需求。这篇文章指出了以前的历史和修辞实践所造成的远不那么明显的限制，包括其他进步社会活动家的一些话语。因此，对于经常不被视为平等公民的残疾人来说，游行作为表演性公共辩论的修辞形式的前景和实践都很复杂。因此，行军的麻烦在于能力主义及其持续的隐形。