当前位置: X-MOL 学术Patterns of Prejudice › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The racialization of danger: patterns and ambiguities in the relation between Islam, security and secularism in the Netherlands
Patterns of Prejudice ( IF 0.5 ) Pub Date : 2020-03-14 , DOI: 10.1080/0031322x.2019.1705011
Martijn de Koning

ABSTRACT The question of European foreign fighters in Syria has transformed security and counter-radicalization into important pillars of the liberal secular governance of Muslims in Europe. By exploring how Dutch integration and counter-radicalization policies connect the idea of danger to Muslims and Islam, de Koning analyses how admission to the Dutch nation-state is regulated according to what kind of deficiencies outsiders are thought to have, locating them in ideas about ‘race’, culture and religion. By focusing on the idea of a racialization of danger, de Koning argues, first, that, already prior to 9/11, a securitization logic existed in Dutch policies in which a form of Islam that was perceived to be ‘unacceptable’ was regarded as a potential danger to social cohesion and the rule of law. And, second, in analysing the process of racialization, that we should take into account its ambiguities in order to understand how the racialization of Muslims works.

中文翻译:

危险的种族化:荷兰伊斯兰教、安全和世俗主义之间关系的模式和模糊性

摘要 叙利亚的欧洲外国战士问题已将安全和反激进化转变为欧洲穆斯林自由世俗治理的重要支柱。通过探索荷兰一体化和反激进化政策如何将危险观念与穆斯林和伊斯兰教联系起来,德科宁分析了如何根据外界认为的缺陷类型来规范荷兰民族国家的接纳,并将他们定位在关于“种族”、文化和宗教。通过关注危险种族化的想法,德科宁首先认为,在 9/11 之前,荷兰政策中已经存在一种安全化逻辑,其中一种被认为“不可接受”的伊斯兰教形式被视为对社会凝聚力和法治的潜在威胁。其次,
更新日期:2020-03-14
down
wechat
bug