当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of the Philosophy of Sport › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
From ‘philosophy of sport’ to ‘philosophies of sports’? History, identity and diversification of sport philosophy
Journal of the Philosophy of Sport ( IF 0.800 ) Pub Date : 2019-09-06 , DOI: 10.1080/00948705.2019.1660882
Gunnar Breivik 1
Affiliation  

ABSTRACT

My goal in this article is to give a portrait of how modern sport philosophy, which started in 1972, developed from relatively narrow paradigmatic borders to become a diverse and multi-paradigmatic international discipline. This development has included several changes but also some continuity. I identify three main tenets that may be viable in the future. One is to focus on the traditional sport philosophical paradigm, which had an ambition to identify the essence of sport. A second option is to develop more specific approaches, focusing on single sports or types of sport, like football or climbing. A third alternative is to develop a philosophy, not only of sport but of ‘homo movens’, studying the moving human being in different environmental and socio-cultural contexts. All three options are viable and should be welcomed.



中文翻译:

从“体育哲学”到“体育哲学”?体育哲学的历史,特征和多元化

摘要

我在本文中的目的是要概述一下始于1972年的现代体育哲学如何从相对狭窄的范式边界发展成为多样化和多范式的国际学科。这一发展既包括一些变化,也包括一些连续性。我确定了将来可能可行的三个主要原则。一种是专注于传统体育哲学范式,该范式旨在确定体育的本质。第二种选择是开发更具体的方法,专注于单一运动或某种类型的运动,例如足球或攀岩。第三种选择是发展一种哲学,不仅是运动哲学,而且是“同志感动者”,在不同的环境和社会文化背景下研究运动的人。这三种选择都是可行的,应该受到欢迎。

更新日期:2019-09-06
down
wechat
bug