ABSTRACT Bernard Suits’ account of play as an autotelic activity has been greatly influential in the philosophy of sport. Suits borrows the notion of ‘autotelicity’ from Aristotle’s ethics, formulating different iterations of the notions of ‘play’ and ‘game play’ that challenge the Stagirite’s views of the good life. In particular, Suits questions Aristotle’s identification of the good life with the one that involves engaging in contemplation, which Aristotle regards as the only fully autotelic and self-sufficient activity. Thus, Aristotle’s notion of ‘autotelicity’ and its connections to the good life are key to comprehend Suits’ views of play. Particularly, Suits draws on and revises Aristotle’s response to the question about the good life, as well as his notion of play (paidia), in order to identify game play as the purely autotelic and self-sufficient activity in which the good life consists.

中文翻译：

---

玩耍是否构成美好生活？西服和亚里士多德的汽车知识和生活水平

摘要伯纳德·西特斯（Bernard Suits）将比赛作为一项自动活动的说法对体育哲学产生了巨大影响。西服从亚里士多德的伦理学中借用了“自律性”的概念，提出了“玩法”和“游戏玩法”概念的不同迭代，这些挑战挑战了斯塔吉里特人对美好生活的看法。特别是，西服通过涉及沉思的方式来质疑亚里士多德对美好生活的认同，亚里士多德认为这是唯一完全自动和自给自足的活动。因此，亚里士多德的“自律性”概念及其与美好生活的联系对于理解西服的游戏观至关重要。特别是，西服借鉴并修改了亚里士多德对美好生活以及他的游戏概念（花paid）的回应，