ABSTRACT

Building mixed-tenure communities is increasingly promoted as a way to increase housing supply and improve community outcomes. However, communities described as mixed-tenure vary greatly. The lack of a common understanding of mixed-tenure communities presents a challenge to researchers seeking to evaluate their effects. We identify a range of views from New Zealand stakeholders as to what tenures are present in a mixed-tenure community, what proportion of mixed-tenure communities is public housing, how the different tenures are integrated, where public housing is placed, and how housing is designed. We propose ways to clarify discussions about mixed-tenure communities, and priorities for research.

抽象的

作为增加住房供应和改善社区成果的一种方式，越来越多地促进建立混合居住社区。但是，被描述为混合使用权的社区差异很大。对混合使用权社区缺乏共识，这对寻求评估其影响的研究人员构成了挑战。我们从新西兰利益相关者那里发现了一系列意见，涉及混合租赁社区中存在哪些保有权，公共住房中混合租赁社区所占的比例，不同租赁方式的整合方式，公共住房的放置位置以及住房的方式被设计。我们提出了一些方法来澄清有关混合权社区的讨论以及研究的重点。