This paper examines the Rockefeller Foundation's 100 Resilient Cities (100RC) initiative in Melbourne and frames this as an experiment in urban resilience governance and planning. We respond to the call from urban resilience scholars to consider the 5Ws (who, what, where, when and why?) of resilience and consider what this means for reframing urban resilience implementation. Melbourne is one of the first wave of 33 cities involved in 100RC and the release of the 2016 Strategy is the first attempt at urban resilience governance and planning in this city. We examine its role in mobilizing urban resilience reflecting on the 5Ws and also the ‘how’, as a governance experiment. With no metropolitan mandate and within a highly fragmented governing context, we develop an analytical framework to assess the 100RC Melbourne initiative identifying a set of conditions for transformative urban resilience implementation incorporating four dimensions – governance and institutional settings (how); inclusions/exclusions (who); framing and purpose (why and what); and system boundaries and interventions (where and when). We reflect on how urban resilience has been framed and adapted within this initiative and the extent to which this process of urban resilience implementation may have the capacity to influence, disrupt or change mainstream urban policy and planning frameworks. We highlight the institution building role the 100RC is playing by mediating between, and connecting, actors, sectors, and interests. We discuss the prospects for shaping a more integrated and inclusive mode of urban governance and resilience planning, a need which has become particularly acute in the context of the shock and ongoing stressor of COVID 19. We conclude by arguing that while experiments such as the 100RC initiative can demonstrate new ways of working collaboratively, explicit attention must be paid to the sets of conditions required to mobilize transformative change in urban resilience implementation.

本文研究了洛克菲勒基金会（Rockefeller Foundation）在墨尔本的100个抗灾城市（100RC）计划，并将其作为城市抗灾力治理和规划的实验。我们回应了城市弹性研究者的呼吁，要考虑5W（谁，什么，在哪里，何时何地以及为什么？），并考虑这对重新定义城市弹性实施意味着什么。墨尔本是参与100RC的33个城市中的第一批浪潮之一，《 2016年战略》的发布是该城市首次进行城市弹性治理和规划的尝试。我们将其作为治理实验，考察其在动员5W以及“如何”反映的城市抗灾力中的作用。没有大都市的授权，并且在高度分散的治理环境中，我们开发了一个分析框架，以评估墨尔本100RC计划，从而确定一套实施变革性城市抗灾力的条件，其中包括四个方面-治理和体制设置（如何）；包含/排除（谁）；框架和目的（为什么和什么）；和系统边界和干预措施（何时何地）。我们将反思在此倡议中如何构建和适应城市弹性，以及城市弹性实施过程可以在多大程度上影响，破坏或改变主流城市政策和规划框架。我们通过在参与者，部门和利益之间进行调解和联系来强调100RC在机构建设中的作用。