As part of the Yugoslav in-between periphery, Ljubljana became a site of interaction between an antisystemic movement, literature and theory, the fields that in Paris were arguably only co-present during the long 1968. Following Franco Moretti and Perry Anderson’s notion of modernism as a cultural field of force experiencing the imaginative proximity of social revolution, the experimental literature of the 1960s may be viewed as the last season of modernism. This is when modernism in Slovenia synchronized with Paris, the metropole that Pascale Casanova has described as the Greenwich meridian of literary modernity. Peripheries in the literary world-system are, for Moretti, forced into a belated compromise between local perspectives and globalized forms emanating from metropoles. In this case, however, it is due to its peripherality that Slovenian literature was able to produce an innovative political interlacement of theory and literature (for example, the internationally acclaimed neo-avant-garde group OHO and the Ljubljana Lacanian circle). In the 1960s and 1970s, the Ljubljana student journal Tribuna published experimental literature, (post)structuralist theory and antisystemic political writings. The mere contiguity of these discourses evoked their interaction. Even stronger modes of interaction characterized their production and mediation, such as writer-theorists translating French theory or various hybrids of theory and literature. Slavoj Žižek’s early hybrid texts show the emergence of theory as a parasite of literature and philosophy. They deconstruct the (nationalist) author function. A scandal provoked by Žižek in 1967 foretells the split of the ‘68 avant-garde between the theoretical and literary faction in the 1970s.

作为南斯拉夫中间边缘的一部分，卢布尔雅那成为反体系运动、文学和理论之间相互作用的场所，巴黎的这些领域可以说是在漫长的 1968 年才共同存在的。 遵循佛朗哥莫雷蒂和佩里安德森的现代主义概念1960 年代的实验文学作为体验社会革命想象接近的文化力量场域，可被视为现代主义的最后一季。这是斯洛文尼亚的现代主义与巴黎同步的时候，巴黎被帕斯卡尔·卡萨诺瓦描述为文学现代性的格林威治子午线。对莫雷蒂来说，文学世界体系中的边缘被迫在地方观点和源自大都市的全球化形式之间做出迟来的妥协。然而，在这种情况下，正是由于其边缘性，斯洛文尼亚文学才能够产生理论和文学的创新政治交织（例如，国际知名的新前卫团体 OHO 和卢布尔雅那拉康派）。在 1960 和 1970 年代，卢布尔雅那学生杂志Tribuna发表了实验文献、（后）结构主义理论和反体制政治著作。仅仅是这些话语的连续性就引起了他们的互动。甚至更强的互动模式表征了它们的生产和中介，例如翻译法国理论的作家理论家或各种理论和文学的混合体。Slavoj Žižek 的早期混合文本表明，理论是作为文学和哲学的寄生虫出现的。他们解构了（民族主义的）作者功能。1967 年 Žižek 挑起的丑闻预示了 68 年代先锋派在 1970 年代理论派和文学派之间的分裂。