Knowledge transfer and exchange (KTE) has become an integral part of organizational practice. Evaluation of KTE, as well as knowledge products generated through this process, is important for understanding the effectiveness of KTE strategies. This scoping review aimed to identify tools and frameworks used to evaluate knowledge uptake and utilization (KUU).

The search strategy included review of PubMed and Scopus databases, hand searching of relevant journals, and citation tracing. Over 6500 abstracts were screened; 292 full-text articles were shortlisted by two reviewers.

Seventy-two articles described tools for evaluating KUU. A total of 23 tools could be generally applied to knowledge products/processes used in different sectors; 36 evaluation tools were designed for specific knowledge products (i.e., websites); 9 tools were discipline-specific (i.e., medical field), and four articles described evaluations of knowledge products/processes using alternative methods such as Google Analytics or qualitative methods. The majority of tools (n = 40, 56 %) focused on usability of a knowledge product or process.

This scoping review identified various tools being used to assess the effectiveness and impact of KTE processes/products, however, the measures were as varied as the projects, and were often not designed to evaluate KTE in particular.

知识转移和交流 (KTE) 已成为组织实践的一个组成部分。对 KTE 以及通过此过程生成的知识产品的评估对于了解 KTE 策略的有效性很重要。本次范围界定审查旨在确定用于评估知识吸收和利用 (KUU) 的工具和框架。

搜索策略包括审查 PubMed 和 Scopus 数据库、手动搜索相关期刊和引文追踪。筛选了 6500 多篇摘要；292篇全文文章由两位审稿人入围。

72 篇文章描述了评估 KUU 的工具。总共有 23 种工具可以普遍应用于不同部门使用的知识产品/流程；针对特定知识产品（即网站）设计了 36 个评估工具；9 个工具针对特定学科（即医学领域），4 篇文章描述了使用替代方法（例如 Google Analytics 或定性方法）对知识产品/过程的评估。大多数工具（n = 40, 56 %）关注知识产品或过程的可用性。

该范围审查确定了用于评估 KTE 流程/产品的有效性和影响的各种工具，但是，这些措施与项目一样多种多样，并且通常并非专门用于评估 KTE。