Warren Quinn suggests a presumption against usefully involving others in foreseeably harmful agency. Frances Kamm offers her Party Case, in which one throws a party only because one expects one’s guests will feel indebted to clean up, to argue that Quinn’s presumption should not apply to all agency undertaken because it will bring about this involvement but only to agency in which this involvement is intended. I offer impermissible and intentional variants of Party Case and consider other cases to argue that the permissibility of usefully involving others depends on their independent rights, rather than whether their involvement is intended.

中文翻译：

---

重新思考党的案例：反对采取行动的推定，因为一个人预见到一个人会有害地牵涉到另一个人

沃伦·奎因 (Warren Quinn) 建议推定，不要让他人参与可预见的有害机构。弗朗西斯·卡姆 (Frances Kamm) 提供了她的派对案例，在该案例中，人们举办派对只是因为人们希望自己的客人会觉得欠债清理，以争辩说奎因的推定不应适用于所有进行的代理，因为它会带来这种参与，而仅适用于代理这种参与的目的是什么。我提供了当事人案例的不允许和故意的变体，并考虑了其他案例，以论证有效地让他人参与的许可取决于他们的独立权利，而不是他们是否有意参与。