Here, I put forth a construal of P. F. Strawson’s so-called reversal, his view that what it means to be morally responsible is determined (in some way) by our practices of holding responsible. The “concern-based” construal that I defend holds that what it means to be morally responsible is determined by the basic social concerns of which our practices are an expression. This construal, I argue, avoids a dilemma that Patrick Todd has recently raised for the reversal.

中文翻译：

---

责任、自由主义者和“我们所知道的事实”：对斯特劳森逆转的基于关注的解释

在这里，我提出了对 PF Strawson 所谓逆转的解释，他的观点是，道德责任意味着什么（在某种程度上）由我们承担责任的做法决定。我所捍卫的“基于关注”的解释认为，道德责任意味着什么取决于我们的实践所表达的基本社会关注。我认为，这种解释避免了帕特里克·托德（Patrick Todd）最近提出的逆转困境。