The Anthropocene overthrows classical dichotomies like technology and nature and a new class of beings emerges: hybrids. The transitive status of hybrids - which establishes an extra, separate, ‘third’ ontological category, going beyond the dichotomy between nature and technology - constitutes a significant problem for environmental philosophy and philosophy of technology since they traditionally focus on either ʼnature’ (natural entities) or ‘artefacts’ (technological objects). In order to reflect on the ethical significance of hybrids, a classification of different types of hybrids is required. Such a classification is provided by this article, based on insights from both environmental philosophy and philosophy of technology. After explaining why a new class of beings emerges in the Anthropocene, and reflecting on the one-sidedness of philosophy of technology and environmental philosophy in their focus on either technology or nature, we propose a new classification of hybrids in this article that provides a new starting point for reflections on the moral significance of hybrids in environmental philosophy and philosophy of technology.

中文翻译：

---

如何处理人类世的杂种？迈向技术哲学和环境哲学 2.0

人类世推翻了技术和自然等经典的二分法，出现了一类新的生物：混血儿。混合体的传递状态——它建立了一个额外的、独立的、“第三”本体论类别，超越了自然和技术之间的二分法——构成了环境哲学和技术哲学的一个重大问题，因为它们传统上关注于“自然”（自然实体） ）或“人工制品”（技术对象）。为了反映杂种的伦理意义，需要对不同类型的杂种进行分类。本文基于环境哲学和技术哲学的见解提供了这样的分类。在解释了为什么在人类世出现了一类新的生物之后，