How can we practice an “anthropology of disability” that is in respectful alliance with the disabled people and disability groups we study? What does critical theory making look like within the politics of such collaborative practice? What valued expertise do anthropologists offer and what do anthropologists gain? In an age of austerity and precarity in academia and in general, disabled people and disability groups struggle for survival while secure funding for grants and programs supporting graduate students and emerging scholars is increasingly precarious. In what interdependent spaces is it possible to imagine disabled activists and scholars working together for survival into an uncertain future? These questions stand at the heart of this collaborative auto-ethnographic essay.

中文翻译：

---

紧缩时期的激进主义、人类学和残疾研究

我们如何实践与我们所研究的残疾人和残疾群体相互尊重的“残疾人类学”？在这种协作实践的政治中，批判性理论的形成是什么样的？人类学家提供哪些有价值的专业知识，人类学家获得什么？在学术界和一般而言，在一个紧缩和不稳定的时代，残疾人和残疾群体为生存而奋斗，而为支持研究生和新兴学者的助学金和计划的安全资金却越来越不稳定。在哪些相互依存的空间中，可以想象残疾活动家和学者为生存而共同努力，进入不确定的未来？这些问题是这篇协作性自动民族志文章的核心。