The University as a Crowd Universities in Europe are a medieval invention we owe to the Roman Catholic Church, which wemore succinctly call “the Church.”Today, they exist all around the world; they are secularized; they make up one of the major forms of the modern gathering. In 1921, Sigmund Freud studied crowd phenomena. He contrasted “natural” crowds, which form spontaneously, with “artificial” crowds, which result from an institutional constraint. Among “artificial” crowds, hementioned the Army and the Church in particular. With good reason: these institutions, at once ancient and still strong, could be found in almost all European countries. Today, this is no longer the case. One of the implicit founding principles of the Europe of Treaties is that the role of the Army should be radically cut back. Not only does the Army carry no weight in governmental decisions, it also does not even determine the little military politics some states wish to preserve. With respect to social life, the Army is more and more absent. While armies do exist, the Army, in the singular form and capitalized (the Army that carried so much weight in the Algerian War) does not exist anymore in the Schengen Area. It exists in Turkey, and this is, without a doubt, what stands in the way of

中文翻译：

---

分裂的普遍性

作为人群的大学 欧洲的大学是我们归功于罗马天主教会的中世纪发明，我们更简洁地将其称为“教会”。今天，它们存在于世界各地；他们是世俗化的；它们构成了现代聚会的主要形式之一。1921 年，西格蒙德·弗洛伊德 (Sigmund Freud) 研究了人群现象。他将自发形成的“自然”人群与制度约束产生的“人工”人群进行了对比。在“人造”人群中，他特别提到了军队和教会。有充分的理由：这些机构既古老又强大，几乎在所有欧洲国家都可以找到。今天，情况不再如此。条约欧洲的隐含创始原则之一是应从根本上削减陆军的作用。陆军不仅在政府决策中没有影响力，它甚至不能决定某些国家希望保留的小规模军事政治。在社会生活方面，军队越来越缺席。虽然军队确实存在，但在申根地区不再存在单一形式和大写的军队（在阿尔及利亚战争中承担如此重任的军队）。它存在于土耳其，毫无疑问，这是阻碍