当前位置: X-MOL 学术American Antiquity › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
There Is No Cherokee Syllabary at Red Bird River Shelter (15CY52): Reply to Tankersley and Weeks
American Antiquity ( IF 2.7 ) Pub Date : 2020-04-01 , DOI: 10.1017/aaq.2020.5
Jan F. Simek , Beau Duke Carroll , Julie Reed , Alan Cressler , Tom Belt , Wayna Adams , Mary White

Despite new arguments by Tankersley and Weeks that we misinterpreted petroglyph engravings and ignored site formation processes at the Red Bird River Shelter in Kentucky (15CY52), we remain convinced that there is no evidence for Cherokee Syllabary writing at the site. The petroglyphs are clearly not symbols present in any version of the Cherokee Syllabary. There is no empirical evidence for any site formation processes that have altered the shelter or its petroglyphs in the ways they suggest. There is still no evidence that Sequoyah ever spent any time in the vicinity of Red Bird River Shelter.

中文翻译:

Red Bird River Shelter (15CY52) 没有切诺基语音节:回复 Tankersley 和 Weeks

尽管 Tankersley 和 Weeks 提出了新的论点,即我们误解了肯塔基州 Red Bird River Shelter (15CY52) 的岩画雕刻并忽略了遗址形成过程,但我们仍然相信,没有证据表明该遗址存在切诺基音节书写的证据。岩画显然不是任何版本的切诺基音节中出现的符号。没有任何经验证据表明任何场地形成过程以他们建议的方式改变了庇护所或其岩画。仍然没有证据表明 Sequoyah 曾在 Red Bird River Shelter 附近待过。
更新日期:2020-04-01
down
wechat
bug