In this rejoinder, we address Kettler’s comments regarding our article for this special section regarding the validation practices employed with recently translated and adapted versions of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC), which are used by school and educational psychologists in clinical practice around the world. Whereas we seek to briefly clarify points of minor contention, there is much that we agree on from the commentary. We reiterate the need to take seriously established psychometric standards in our discipline when validating commercial ability measures for the benefit of our ethical charges.

中文翻译：

---

关于学校心理能力测验的验证：既定的心理测验标准重要吗？

在本文的第二部分中，我们针对本节的文章，特别是关于凯特勒的评论，该特例涉及最近翻译和改编的《韦氏儿童智力量表》（WISC）所采用的验证方法，学校和教育心理学家将其用于临床实践中。世界。尽管我们试图简要澄清次要争论点，但我们在评论中有很多共识。我们重申在验证商业能力措施以符合我们的道德准则时，必须在我们的学科中采用认真建立的心理测量标准。