ABSTRACT

In the entrepreneurial university, epistemic governance is exerted through external pressures of market competition, funding, university rankings and research assessment and internal processes of organisational restructuring and mechanisms of corporate governance to re/produce epistemic injustices. Data from a study of three Australian universities illustrate the implications of these for the Humanities and Social Sciences, numerically feminised fields of research and practice and how, in the Australian context, political conservatism aligns with a particular Anglophone sensibility regarding science and society. Excluding the social and critical knowledge practices of the humanities and social sciences is dangerous to both the academy and democracies, particularly in post-truth times.

摘要

在创业型大学中，认知治理是通过市场竞争，资金，大学排名和研究评估以及组织改组的内部流程和公司治理机制（重制/产生认知不公）的外部压力施加的。来自对三所澳大利亚大学的研究得出的数据表明，这对人文社会科学，数字化研究和实践领域女性化的意义以及在澳大利亚的背景下，政治保守主义如何与特定的英语在科学和社会领域的敏感性相吻合。排除人文科学和社会科学的社会和批判知识实践对学院和民主国家都是危险的，特别是在后真理时期。