This study examines how Asian people conceive of the United Nations, World Bank, and International Monetary Fund, from three major arguments that have highlighted distinct sources of acceptance of, or distrust for, intergovernmental organizations (IOs). First, the outcome from multilevel analysis across eight Asian societies is supportive of the domestic proxies hypothesis, because the attitudes in favor of IOs parallel those developed from the evaluation of domestic politics with regard to democracy deficit, trust in government, and involvement in formal organizations. Second, in testing a cultural conflict hypothesis, religion produces a notable impact: Muslims, compared to Christians and Buddhists, are more reluctant to accept IOs. Third, an individual's transnational experiences do not generate impact, casting doubt on whether global exposure necessarily operates to form a preference toward the current global order. National economic and political conditions and foreign aid are also inspected for their “elevator effects.”

中文翻译：

---

国内政治，文化冲突和全球风险：整个亚洲政府间组织的看法

这项研究从三个主要论点中考察了亚洲人如何构想联合国，世界银行和国际货币基金组织，这些论据强调了接受或不信任政府间组织的不同来源。首先，来自八个亚洲社会的多层次分析结果支持了国内代理人的假设，因为支持IO的态度与对民主赤字，对政府的信任以及对正式组织的参与方面的国内政治评估所得出的态度平行。其次，在检验文化冲突假设时，宗教产生了显着影响：与基督徒和佛教徒相比，穆斯林不愿接受IO。第三，个人的跨国经验不会产生影响，怀疑全球风险敞口是否一定会形成对当前全球秩序的偏好。还检查了国家经济和政治条件以及外国援助的“电梯效应”。