当前位置: X-MOL 学术Sociology Compass › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Privacy violations and procedural justice in the United States prisons and jails
Sociology Compass ( IF 2.538 ) Pub Date : 2020-12-26 , DOI: 10.1111/soc4.12847
Sydney Ingel 1 , Arden Richards‐Karamarkovich 1 , Stephanie Bietsch 1 , Danielle S. Rudes 1
Affiliation  

Through constitutional amendments and case law, the United States citizens receive privacy protections. These same protections do not exist for individuals incarcerated in prisons and jails. Instead, their privacy rights are regularly replaced by larger institutional concerns for security, safety, and control. Such privacy violation measures may include electronic surveillance, recording of phone calls, opening/reading of mail, and searches of their person, cell, and property. Although it is expected that incarcerated individuals have fewer privacy rights than nonincarcerated citizens, some privacy violations may be perceived as procedurally unjust due to their severity and infringement upon incarcerated individuals' rights to dignity and respect. This has implications for the well‐being of incarcerated individuals, the legitimacy of correctional officers, and as a result, the potential safety and security of institutions.

中文翻译:

美国监狱中侵犯隐私权和程序正义

通过宪法修正案和判例法,美国公民获得了隐私保护。对于被关押在监狱和监狱中的个人,没有同样的保护措施。取而代之的是,他们的隐私权通常会被更大的机构关注度所取代,以解决安全性,安全性和控制性问题。此类侵犯隐私的措施可能包括电子监视,电话录音,打开/阅读邮件以及搜索其人员,牢房和财产。尽管可以预料,被监禁者的隐私权要比未被监禁的公民少,但由于隐私权的严重性和对被监禁者的尊严和尊重权的侵犯,某些隐私权侵犯行为在程序上可能被认为是不公正的。这对被监禁人员的福祉有影响,
更新日期:2021-02-25
down
wechat
bug