In recent years, studies of gentrification have added a deeper political economic, political, and cultural understanding to this process by demonstrating how it can be understood as not only driven by the physical displacement of working‐class residents but also by the political, cultural, and physical displacement of poor and working‐class Black, Latinx, Asian, and Indigenous populations. In this study, I review these recent key works in urban sociology, geography, and urban history which examine the specifically racial and colonial dimensions of gentrification. These works provide invaluable insights to the political economic, political, and cultural dimensions of gentrification, but are still constrained by not developing a deeper historical analytics of the racial and colonial structures which shape gentrification. Because of this, the foundations of anti‐Black and anti‐Indigenous racism which make possible the commodification of space and devaluation and dispossession of people that gentrification requires, remain obscured. I argue the alternative frameworks of settler colonialism, internal colonialism, and coloniality—developed largely separate from urban sociology—can provide a sharper analysis to the study of gentrification by helping to more explicitly name and explain the racial and colonial structures, logics, and subjectivities which shape gentrification.

中文翻译：

---

高级化的种族和殖民维度

近年来，对绅士化的研究通过证明如何不仅被工人阶级居民的身体流离失所以及政治，文化，政治，文化，社会，文化等因素的驱动，对这一过程增加了更深刻的政治经济，政治和文化理解。贫困和工人阶级的黑人，拉丁裔，亚洲和土著人口的身体流离失所。在这项研究中，我回顾了这些最近在城市社会学，地理和城市历史中的重要著作，这些著作考察了绅士化的具体种族和殖民维度。这些作品提供了对绅士化的政治经济，政治和文化方面的宝贵见解，但由于没有对塑造绅士化的种族和殖民结构进行深入的历史分析，仍然受到制约。因为这，反黑人和反土著种族主义的基础仍然模糊不清，这些基础使空间商品化，让高档化所需的人贬值和剥夺财产成为可能。我认为，定居者殖民主义，内部殖民主义和殖民主义的替代框架（与城市社会学大相径庭）可以帮助更明确地命名和解释种族和殖民主义的结构，逻辑和主观性，从而为绅士化研究提供更清晰的分析哪个形状高档化。