The aim of this article is to explore the possible emergence of a food sovereignty movement in Poland through the analysis of two farmers protest movements organised in 2012–2019 (Protest Rolników and Agrounia) as well as Polish alternative food networks. The analysed protest movements reacted to the socio‐economic crisis in the countryside which entails a continuous decline of smallholder farming, a process that has started during the 1989 Polish transformation and has intensified following the introduction of the Common Agricultural Policy in the country. It is argued that – due to the prevalence of the modernisation paradigm in the Polish public sphere – the alliance of farmer movements with urban consumer groups would foster legitimacy of the food sovereignty discourse and bring about creation of a strong social movement that could influence public opinion and state policy. However, while the analysed groups of farmers and urban consumers share some goals, their discourses on food and agricultural issues differ, immersed in different worldviews and visions of the countryside. A successful translation of the food sovereignty discourse into the Polish context requires a careful navigation between religious and conservative values, important for family farmers, and the more universal ‘cosmopolitan’ ideas promoted by urban consumers.

中文翻译：

---

超越现代化范式：波兰农民抗议运动和替代性食品网络中的食品主权话语元素

本文的目的是通过分析2012-2019年组织的两次农民抗议运动（抗议Rolników和Agrounia）以及波兰的替代食品网络，来探讨波兰可能出现的粮食主权运动。经过分析的抗议运动对农村的社会经济危机作出了反应，该危机导致小农耕种的持续减少。这一过程始于1989年波兰转型，并随着该国实施《共同农业政策》而加剧。有人认为，由于波兰公共领域普遍存在现代化范式，农民运动与城市消费者群体的联盟将促进粮食主权话语的合法性，并引发可能影响公众舆论的强大的社会运动。和国家政策。然而，尽管分析过的农民和城市消费者群体有一些共同目标，但他们对粮食和农业问题的论述却有所不同，陷入了不同的世界观和农村视野。要成功地将粮食主权的话语翻译成波兰语，就需要在宗教价值观和保守价值观之间进行谨慎的导航，这对家庭农民很重要，而城市消费者则提倡更为普遍的“世界性”思想。尽管所分析的农民和城市消费者群体有一些共同目标，但他们对粮食和农业问题的论述却有所不同，陷入了不同的世界观和农村视野。要成功地将粮食主权的话语翻译成波兰语，就需要在宗教价值观和保守价值观之间进行谨慎的导航，这对家庭农民很重要，而城市消费者则提倡更为普遍的“世界性”思想。尽管所分析的农民和城市消费者群体有一些共同目标，但他们对粮食和农业问题的论述却有所不同，陷入了不同的世界观和农村视野。要成功地将粮食主权的话语翻译成波兰语，就需要在宗教价值观和保守价值观之间进行谨慎的导航，这对家庭农民很重要，而城市消费者则提倡更为普遍的“世界性”思想。