In their attempts to associate the nationalistic ideology with speculative promises to emancipate the people from malevolent ‘outsiders’, right‐wing populists often engage with rural and agricultural topics. Meanwhile, green parties, commonly associated with the progressive ideas of environmentally friendly agriculture, occasionally employ the binary logic of agrarian populism. This paper has three objectives. First, to identify the discursive features of rural (right‐wing and agrarian) populism. Second, to examine how these discursive differences unfold in agricultural, party politics. Third, to examine the implications of overlapping ideas of populist and green parties for emancipatory rural politics. The study is predominantly based on the analysis of political discourses in Hungary: Jobbik (right‐wing populist) and LMP (green party), while the agricultural discourse of Fidesz, the ruling right‐wing populist party will serve as the background to the analysis. Particular attention is given to the aesthetic, symbolic, and material dimensions of land in discourse, including environmentally friendly farming and the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy (CAP).

中文翻译：

---

“国土耕作”还是“农村解放”？匈牙利民粹党与绿党之间的话语重叠

右翼民粹主义者试图将民族主义意识形态与投机的诺言联系起来，以使人民摆脱恶毒的“局外人”，因而常常涉及农村和农业问题。同时，通常与环保农业的进步思想联系在一起的绿党偶尔会采用农业民粹主义的二元逻辑。本文有三个目标。首先，确定农村（右翼和农业）民粹主义的话语特征。其次，考察这些话语差异在农业，政党政治中是如何发展的。第三，考察民粹主义和绿党重叠思想对解放性农村政治的影响。该研究主要基于对匈牙利政治话语的分析：Jobbik（右翼民粹主义者）和LMP（绿党），在Fidesz的农业讨论中，执政的右翼民粹党将作为分析的背景。特别注意话语中土地的美学，象征和物质方面，包括环境友好型农业和欧盟的共同农业政策（CAP）。