Oceania ( IF 0.4 ) Pub Date : 2020-12-16 , DOI: 10.1002/ocea.5269 Dion Enari 1 , Aiono Manu Fa'aea 2
1 INTRODUCTION
As Samoan academics, we acknowledge the problematic usage of the term Pasifika. This term does not describe the distinctive, ethnic‐specific nature of each Pacific nation. We also acknowledge the complexities of recording ethnicity itself, given that many people belong to multiple ethnic backgrounds. However, for the purposes of this article, we use the term Pasifika to highlight the shared similarities and collective nature of peoples of the Pacific, and in particular, their collective resilience.
E tumau le fa'avae ae fesuia'i faiga
The foundation remains but the ways of doing change
This article juxtaposes our observations and experiences of COVID‐19 with our personal research journeys. It highlights how, as Pasifika researchers, we navigate the spaces between our Pasifika communities, and our position within them.
中文翻译:
E fatuma le fa'avae ae fesuia'i faiga
1引言
作为萨摩亚的学者,我们承认Pasifika一词的用法有问题。该术语未描述每个太平洋国家的独特种族特征。鉴于许多人属于多个种族背景,我们也承认记录种族本身的复杂性。但是,出于本文的目的,我们使用“ Pasifika”一词来强调太平洋各国人民的共同相似性和集体性,尤其是他们的集体复原力。
E fatuma le fa'avae ae fesuia'i faiga
基础仍然存在,但是改变的方式
本文通过我们的个人研究旅程,将我们对COVID‐19的观察和体验并列。它强调了作为Pasifika研究人员的我们如何导航Pasifika社区之间的空间以及我们在社区中的位置。