This study investigated the status of data citation guidelines by analysing 15 style manuals and 100 data repositories in various fields. Analysis results are presented through a comparison with eight items in the Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (JDDCP). Only nine style manuals and only 20 repositories contain instructions regarding data citation. The guidelines generally agree on the importance of the author, publication date, title, and publisher, but there is large variation between the different guides. Analysis of the guidelines revealed that they generally reflect the principles of the JDDCP. In particular, the principle of Credit and Attribution is significantly reflected in style manuals and data repositories and supports one of the major motivations for data sharing. The principles of Unique Identification, Access, and Persistence are less well supported in data citation guidelines. However, the principles of Importance, Evidence, Specificity and Verifiability, and Interoperability and Flexibility are rarely supported. The findings of this study reveal that better guidelines are required, and future work could investigate developing and assessing the standard guidelines for data citation in different fields.

中文翻译：

---

在样式手册和数据存储库中检查数据引用指南

本研究通过分析各个领域的15种样式手册和100个数据存储库，研究了数据引用指南的状况。通过与《数据引用原则联合声明》（JDDCP）中的八个项目进行比较，给出了分析结果。只有9种样式手册和20个存储库包含有关数据引用的说明。指南通常在作者，出版日期，标题和出版者的重要性上达成共识，但是不同指南之间存在很大差异。对准则的分析表明，它们总体上反映了JDDCP的原则。特别是，信用和归因原理在样式手册和数据存储库中得到了显着体现，并支持数据共享的主要动机之一。唯一标识，访问权，数据引用指南中对持久性和持久性的支持较少。但是，很少支持重要性，证据，特异性和可验证性以及互操作性和灵活性的原则。这项研究的结果表明，需要更好的指南，未来的工作可能会调查开发和评估不同领域中数据引用的标准指南。