As access to and control of land is increasingly contested, indigenous land management schemes promise to secure formal land rights. This article is concerned with one such scheme, Dayak, Wake Up (Dayak Misik) in Indonesia. The implementation of the scheme, orchestrated by a Dayak farmers’ organization, was rejected by the semi‐nomadic Punan Murung as they did not share the same notions and conceptions of land and resources, which are intertwined with struggles over access and control. Framed with the concept of conflicting ecologies, thereby combining material political ecology with phenomenological and relational approaches, this article elaborates on different conceptions, relations, and terms of engagement with nature by the Punan Murung and representatives of the Dayak farmers’ organization, which are strongly interlinked with power relations. I show that the ecology of ethnically framed territorialization by the organization is hegemonic and subordinates the Punan Murung's alternative place‐based ecology.

中文翻译：

---

``我们已经清醒多年了''：印度尼西亚土著土地管理计划中的生态矛盾

随着获取和控制土地的竞争日益激烈，土著土地管理计划有望确保获得正式的土地权。本文涉及一种这样的方案，Dayak，唤醒（Dayak Misik）在印度尼西亚。由达雅克农民组织策划的该计划的实施遭到了半游牧民族普南·穆龙（Punan Murung）的拒绝，因为他们没有相同的土地和资源概念和观念，而这些观念和观念与获取和控制权的斗争交织在一起。本文以冲突生态学的概念为框架，将物质政治生态学与现象学和关系学方法相结合，阐述了普南·穆龙和达雅克农民组织代表的不同观念，关系和与自然的接触条件。与权力关系相互联系。我证明了该组织以族裔为框架的地域化生态学是霸权主义，并隶属于普南穆龙的替代性地基生态学。