Sociological research has documented effectively the ways in which the higher education landscape in many parts of the world has become marketised over recent decades (e.g. Baldwin and James, 2000; Holtta et al., 2011; Naidoo et al., 2011; Slaughter and Cantwell, 2012). This has highlighted, for example, the introduction, in some countries at least, of principles of New Public Management (Deem et al., 2007; Wright and Ørberg, 2017); tuition fees (Gale and Parker, 2018; Wilkins et al., 2013); metrics encouraging institutions to compete against one another (Sabri, 2013; Tavares and Cardoso, 2013); and consumer rights legislation (Tomlinson, 2018). These developments have typically been linked to the spread of neoliberal globalisation across the Global North. While there is now plentiful evidence of the ways in which such changes have been played out at the level of policy and institutional management, we know less about their impact on the everyday lives of students. This is particularly the case with respect to non-English-speaking nations. While studies in Australia, New Zealand, the US, and the UK have explored how various market-led reforms (often those related to changes in funding arrangements) have affected the experiences of students (e.g. Nissen, 2019) and, in some cases, their families (e.g. Zaloom, 2019), we know less about the impact of market pressures in other parts of the world. Moreover, even in Anglophone countries, there is not always consensus among scholars. For example, writing with respect to the UK in particular, while some researchers have argued that, as a result of paying higher fees, students have taken on the identity of consumers (e.g. Molesworth et al., 2009; Nixon et al., 2018), others have shown how some students actively resist such an identity, believing that it undermines the two-way nature of learning and their role as an active contributor to their own education (Tomlinson, 2017).

中文翻译：

---

市场化高等教育领域的学生：简介

社会学研究有效地记录了近几十年来世界上许多地方的高等教育市场已被市场化的方式（例如Baldwin和James，2000； Holtta等，2011； Naidoo等，2011； Slaughter和Cantwell） ，2012）。例如，这突显了至少在一些国家引入了新公共管理原则（Deem等，2007； Wright和Ørberg，2017）。学费（Gale和Parker，2018; Wilkins等，2013）; 鼓励机构相互竞争的指标（Sabri，2013； Tavares和Cardoso，2013）；消费者权益法》（汤姆林森，2018年）。这些发展通常与新自由主义全球化在全球北部的蔓延有关。尽管现在有足够的证据表明在政策和机构管理方面进行这种改变的方式，但我们对这种改变对学生日常生活的影响知之甚少。对于非英语国家来说尤其如此。在澳大利亚，新西兰，美国和英国进行的研究中，探索了各种市场主导的改革（通常是与资金安排变更有关的改革）如何影响学生的经历（例如Nissen，2019年），在某些情况下，他们的家人（例如Zaloom，2019年），我们对市场压力对世界其他地区的影响知之甚少。而且，即使在英语国家，学者之间也不总是达成共识。例如，特别是针对英国撰写的文章，尽管一些研究人员认为，