This paper proposes a new theoretical perspective for understanding urban social spaces and their interrelations. In an effort to understand these multifaceted, complex relations, an inquiry committed to a flat ontology was deployed. Accordingly, we draw our theorization on the Lacanian ontological lack, Harman’s object-oriented ontology, and Laclau and Mouffe’s discursivity of social reality. Thus, we propose that urban social spaces are discursive and real entities with real and sensual qualities and constituted through specific relations. They are located within discursive social relations, where each urban social space has a “differential position” in an urban system of relations. Each urban social space has an “identity,” defined by its specific mixture of social groups and its specific real and sensual qualities. These qualities construct a sensual object with a specific sensual identity within the web of different urban social spaces. Therefore, urban social spaces are being made through multiple interrelations and are constituted through their location in a nexus of positions. The proposed framework that captures the interrelations among urban social spaces is based on three interrelated logics: the logic of difference, the logic of equivalence, and the fantasmatic logic. Understanding the relations of urban social spaces through these logics offers multifaceted social, political, psychological, and spatial illumination, details, and a more nuanced and flexible investigation of the formation and change of these spaces. Hereby, the city is conceived as comprised of spatiotemporal configurations where social spaces have social and political relations ranging from harshly antagonistic to inclusive and equivalent. This proposed framework informs both sociological and political realms of planning theory. It provides planning theory with new perspectives for understanding the city as a web of interrelated social spaces. Furthermore, it allows a more critical understanding of urban reality by illuminating inequality, injustice, antagonism, and the formulation of “otherness.”

本文为理解城市社会空间及其相互关系提出了一个新的理论视角。为了理解这些多方面的，复杂的关系，部署了致力于扁平本体的查询。因此，我们对拉康主义本体论的缺乏，哈曼的面向对象本体论以及拉克劳和穆菲对社会现实的论断性进行了理论化。因此，我们认为城市社会空间是具有特定意义上的关系的，具有话语和感官品质的话语和真实实体。它们位于话语社会关系中，其中每个城市社会空间在城市关系系统中都具有“不同的位置”。每个城市社会空间都有一个“身份”，由其特定的社会群体混合以及其特定的真实和感官品质来定义。这些特质在不同的城市社会空间的网络中构造出具有特定感官身份的感官对象。因此，城市社会空间是通过多重相互联系而形成的，并且是通过它们在位置关系中的位置构成的。所提出的捕获城市社会空间之间相互关系的框架基于三个相互关联的逻辑：差异逻辑，对等逻辑和幻想逻辑。通过这些逻辑来理解城市社会空间的关系，可以提供多方面的社会，政治，心理和空间照明，细节，并可以对这些空间的形成和变化进行更加细致和灵活的研究。特此，这座城市被认为是由时空构成的，其中社会空间的社会和政治关系从严酷的对立到包容和等效。提议的框架为规划理论提供了社会学和政治领域的信息。它为规划理论提供了新的视角，以将城市理解为相互关联的社会空间。此外，它通过阐明不平等，不公正，对立和“其他”的表述，对城市现实有了更批判的理解。