This article uses participant objectivation in sociology and philosophy as two knowledge fields to provide a reflexive comparison of their synced field effect in historical circumstances. Drawing on the philosopher and historian of science Gaston Bachelard, I theorize fielded knowledge as a social relation that combines the prior presence of folk knowledge with a socioanalytic exchange between field and folk that includes positions of either defense, replacement or critique. A comparison of post-Wittgenstein Anglophone philosophy and post-sixties American sociology describes their mutual confrontation with folk psychology as an “epistemological obstacle” that generates a remarkable concern with action as a position-taking on the folk relation. A reflexive objectivation of folk knowledge is therefore necessary for a revised understanding of action that correlates with the distinction of sociology’s knowledge capital and how it fares as an explanatory resource in competitive circumstances. The article concludes by leveraging the synced field effect even further to make a recommendation that sociologists can increase the distinction of their knowledge capital by producing discourse that can recognize, legitimate and officialize experiences that otherwise remain obscure, nameless or impossible within the bounded universe of folk psychology.

中文翻译：

---

六十年代以来美国的社会学和哲学：民间行动障碍的死亡与复活

本文将社会学和哲学中的参与者客观化作为两个知识领域，对其在历史环境下的同步场效应进行反思性比较。借鉴科学哲学家和历史学家加斯顿·巴谢拉德 (Gaston Bachelard)，我将领域知识理论化为一种社会关系，它将民间知识的先验存在与领域与民间之间的社会分析交流结合起来，其中包括防御、替代或批判的立场。对后维特根斯坦英语哲学和 60 后美国社会学的比较将他们与民间心理学的相互对抗描述为“认识论障碍”，产生了对作为对民间关系采取立场的行动的显着关注。因此，对于与社会学知识资本的区别以及它如何在竞争环境中作为解释性资源相关联的行为的修正理解，对民间知识的反思性客观化是必要的。文章最后通过进一步利用同步场效应提出建议，即社会学家可以通过产生能够识别、合法化和官方化经验的话语来增加他们知识资本的区别，否则这些经验在有限的民间世界中仍然是模糊的、无名的或不可能的。心理学。