This case study concerns the challenge of achieving coherence and mutually reinforcing policy instruments in the design of national security policy for complex problems that require a holistic and multi-level government approach. It measures the integration of the various Canadian policies and programs that are applied federally, provincially and municipally to counter violent extremism and the process of radicalization to violence leading to terrorism using the Candel and Biesbroek (Policy Sci 49:211–231, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-016-9248-y ) model of policy integration. It reveals the role of policy frames, subsystem involvement, policy goals and policy instrument choice on policy integration, and identifies implications for Canadian policy and the integration model.

中文翻译：

---

评估跨部门政策问题的整合：加拿大应对暴力激进化方法的案例研究

本案例研究涉及在针对需要整体和多级政府方法的复杂问题设计国家安全政策时实现连贯和相辅相成的政策工具的挑战。它衡量了加拿大在联邦、省和市级应用的各种政策和计划的整合情况，以使用 Candel 和 Biesbroek（Policy Sci 49:211-231, 2016. https）来打击暴力极端主义和导致恐怖主义的激进化暴力过程。 ://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-016-9248-y ) 政策整合模型。它揭示了政策框架、子系统参与、政策目标和政策工具选择对政策整合的作用，并确定了对加拿大政策和整合模型的影响。