This paper proposes a theoretical bridge between frame analysis and the Bourdieusian tradition of field analysis via the concept of linguistic habitus. Framing practices have tended to be explained, microcosmically, in terms of individual psychology or interaction, or macrocosmically, in terms of geopolitics, ideology and hegemony. This paper locates the genesis of framing practice at the mezzo level of the field. In this paper, I develop a Bourdieusian frame analysis through an integration of field and framing theories. Reflecting on my own research regarding news access in solutions journalism, I argue that framing practices are generated by habituation in specific linguistic markets. I argue that a linguistic habitus generates four interrelated framing practices: censorship, euphemism, style and schema. Lastly, I propose a taxonomy of framing practices by mapping the relative tension and ease of linguistic markets against the autonomy or heteronomy of the field.

本文通过语言习性的概念，在框架分析和布迪厄斯主义的田野分析传统之间架起了一座理论桥梁。人们倾向于从个体心理学或互动的角度微观地解释框架的作法，或者从地缘政治，意识形态和霸权方面宏观地解释框架的作法。本文将定位实践的起源定位在该领域的中间层。在本文中，我通过场和框架理论的整合发展了布迪厄斯式的框架分析。考虑到我自己对解决方案新闻中新闻访问的研究，我认为框架实践是由特定语言市场中的习惯所产生的。我认为一种语言习性会产生四种相互关联的框架实践：审查，委婉，风格和图式。最后，