Assume that neuro-doping is safe and efficient. This means that the use of it, and similar future safe methods of enhancement in sport, may help those who are naturally weak to catch up with those who are naturally strong and sometimes even defeat them. The rationale behind anti-doping measures seem to presuppose that this is unfair. But the idea that those who are naturally strong should defeat those who are naturally weak rests on a fascistoid ideology that sport had better leave behind. Neuro-doping may be seen as a means to undermine the fascistoid notion of fairness. The conjecture is that, given that society adopts what will be characterized as a policy of biological egalitarianism, this will happen. Then people will compete in society in general and in sport in particular on more equal biological terms. The fascination with natural strength, and the cheering for the winners, can then go away. Instead we see a liberated sport where we take part in it for the sheer fun of doing so. Neuro-doping, and similar techniques, may be a means that helps to liberate elite sport from its perverse view of fairness.

假设神经兴奋剂是安全有效的。这意味着使用它，以及未来类似的运动增强安全方法，可以帮助那些天生弱者赶上天生强壮的人，有时甚至击败他们。反兴奋剂措施背后的基本原理似乎预设这是不公平的。但是，那些天生强壮的人应该打败天生弱小的人的想法取决于体育最好抛弃的法西斯主义意识形态。神经兴奋剂可能被视为破坏法西斯主义公平观念的一种手段。推测是，鉴于社会采用了一种被称为生物平等主义的政策，这将会发生。然后，人们将在更平等的生理条件下在整个社会，特别是体育运动中竞争。对自然力量的迷恋，然后为获胜者的欢呼声就可以消失了。相反，我们看到了一项解放的运动，我们参加它只是为了这样做的乐趣。神经兴奋剂和类似技术可能是一种有助于将精英体育从其反常的公平观中解放出来的手段。