The benefits of subnational island jurisdiction (SNIJ) status are well detailed, but less attention has been given to the diffusion of economic, social and political benefits associated with these islands’ Islandian sovereignty among diverse island populations. The 2007 UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples indicated the international community’s formal recognition of Indigenous peoples’ rights to political self-determination and govern their own affairs through their own decision-making institutions, and requires states to consult with these organisations to obtain free, prior and informed consent. Yet, few SNIJs with Indigenous peoples have established or restored Indigenous bodies of authority distinct from local governments. In the context of Islandian sovereignty and the unique power relationships organised between metropoles and islands, we consider how Indigenous authorities negotiate independence and dependence, statehood and non-sovereignty, autonomy and control. This article offers a foundational typology for thinking about these multilateral relations between metropoles, SNIJs, and customary or Indigenous authorities.

中文翻译：

---

岛屿主权的三角谈判：土著和习惯机构-大城市国家-地方大城市当局

亚国家级岛屿管辖权（SNIJ）地位的好处已得到详细介绍，但很少有人关注与这些岛屿的岛屿主权相关的经济，社会和政治利益在不同岛屿人口之间的扩散。2007年《联合国土著人民权利宣言》指出，国际社会已正式承认土著人民的政治自决权和通过自己的决策机构管理自己的事务的权利，并要求各国与这些组织进行磋商，以获取免费，事先知情同意。但是，与土著人民合作的SNIJ很少建立或恢复不同于地方政府的土著权力机构。在岛屿主权和大都市与岛屿之间组织的独特权力关系的背景下，我们考虑土著当局如何谈判独立与依赖，国家地位和非主权，自治与控制。本文为思考都市圈，SNIJ与习惯或原住民当局之间的这些多边关系提供了一种基本的类型学。