Elinor Ostrom's IAD and SES frameworks are widely used among social scientists, but each framework suffers from significant problems not shared by the other. The IAD framework lacks detail in terms of the specific social and ecological variables that influence social interactions, resulting in inconsistent applications of a supposedly common framework. The SES framework was designed specifically to resolve that problem, but has lost the dynamic character of the IAD framework. As a result it excels at identifying configurations of social, ecological and institutional factors associated with outcomes, but cannot explain the process by which these factors interact across action situations to generate those outcomes, let alone predict or prescribe changes to social-ecological conditions over time. This article seeks to remedy the problems of each framework by combining them to facilitate detailed and process-oriented studies of social-ecological systems. We then demonstrate the utility of the combined IAD-SES framework by applying it to describe the historical development of Maine's lobster fishery. Future applications of the framework have the potential to address several longstanding questions in the literature on common-pool resources regarding the role of history, power and dynamic social and ecological processes in influencing prospects for environmental sustainability.

中文翻译：

---

整合IAD和SES框架的实用程序

Elinor Ostrom的IAD和SES框架在社会科学家中被广泛使用，但是每个框架都存在彼此之间无法共享的重大问题。IAD框架缺乏影响社会互动的特定社会和生态变量的详细信息，从而导致了所谓的通用框架的不一致应用。SES框架是专门为解决该问题而设计的，但已经失去了IAD框架的动态特性。结果，它擅长识别与结果相关的社会，生态和制度因素的配置，但无法解释这些因素在各种行动情况下相互作用以生成那些结果的过程，更不用说预测或规定随时间变化的社会生态条件。本文旨在通过将它们结合起来以促进对社会生态系统的详细且面向过程的研究，来补救每个框架的问题。然后，我们通过应用它来描述缅因州龙虾捕捞渔业的历史发展，证明了IAD-SES组合框架的实用性。该框架的未来应用有可能解决有关公共资源的文献中几个长期存在的问题，这些问题涉及历史，权力以及动态的社会和生态过程在影响环境可持续性前景方面的作用。