当前位置: X-MOL 学术International Journal of the Commons › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Mapping Ostrom’s common-pool resource systems coding handbook to the coupled infrastructure systems framework to enable comparative research
International Journal of the Commons ( IF 1.8 ) Pub Date : 2019-05-08 , DOI: 10.18352/ijc.904
Michael J. Bernstein , Maria Del Mar Mancha-Cisneros , Madeline Tyson , Ute Brady , Cathy Alida Rubiños , Hoon Cheol Shin , Sechindra Vallury , Skaidra Smith-Heisters , Elicia Ratajczyk

In the study of common-pool resource (CPR) governance, frame- works provide a metatheoretical language to describe system states, dynamics, elements, and relationships. The coding manuals which accompany CPR frame- works–in addition to providing guidelines for connecting empirical case work to conceptual variables–define a vocabulary of coding questions. For empirical work, connecting variables and coding questions with framework elements con- tributes to conceptual advance. In the process of analysis and publication, it is tempting to offer a novel framework without also developing, applying, or modi- fying the foundational questions and variables of coding manuals buttressing said frameworks. However, if the scholarly community is to generate robust knowl- edge for the study of CPR dilemmas, we must provide the underlying work of comparing across frameworks. In this paper, we report on one way the community might conduct such comparisons. We present results and challenges of using a group consensus process to link the more than 450 coding questions derived from the original Institutional Analysis and Development Framework (IADF) to the recently proposed Coupled Infrastructure Systems Framework (CISF). Despite overlap, discrepancies in the conceptual positions of the IADF and CISF suggest a need to modify or create new coding variables related to concepts of system boundaries, externalities, cross-scale interactions, multi-functionality, and tech- nological change. We suggest that such work needs provisioning if commons scholars are to navigate the continued challenges of tailoring frameworks and coding manuals to evolving CPR governance dilemmas.

中文翻译:

将Ostrom的公共池资源系统编码手册映射到耦合的基础架构系统框架以进行比较研究

在研究公共池资源(CPR)治理时,框架提供了一种用于描述系统状态,动态,元素和关系的元理论语言。CPR框架随附的编码手册,除了提供将经验案例工作与概念变量联系起来的指南外,还定义了编码问题的词汇表。对于经验工作,将变量和编码问题与框架元素联系起来有助于概念上的进步。在分析和发布的过程中,很想提供一个新颖的框架,而不用开发,应用或修改支持该框架的编码手册的基本问题和变量。但是,如果学术界要为研究CPR困境产生扎实的知识,我们必须提供跨框架比较的基础工作。在本文中,我们报告了社区进行此类比较的一种方式。我们提出了使用小组共识流程将原始机构分析和开发框架(IADF)衍生的450多个编码问题与最近提出的耦合基础架构系统框架(CISF)链接起来的结果和挑战。尽管存在重叠,但IADF和CISF在概念位置上的差异表明需要修改或创建与系统边界,外部性,跨规模交互,多功能和技术变革等概念相关的新编码变量。
更新日期:2019-05-08
down
wechat
bug