The East-German city Leipzig and the West-German city Osnabrück, the main locations of our research, are among the pioneers of a nationwide movement for the decentralisation of refugee accommodation. At the beginning of the 2010s, local authorities in the two cities decided against housing refugees in mass accommodation centres, instead choosing to support them in leading self-determined lives by facilitating their access to private housing. However, the two cities then responded very differently to the increasing number of people coming to Germany for protection over the course of 2015. Based on empirical observations, this paper discusses an exemplary solution to a major research problem of how to compare the diverse and changing practices and discourses of refugee accommodation in local migration regimes. To find answers to this question, we develop a five-dimensional comparative model, combining the relational rescaling approach of Nina Glick Schiller and Ayse Çağlar with Henri Lefebvre's spatial constructivist considerations.

中文翻译：

---

有所作为 - 莱比锡和奥斯纳布吕克的难民住宿

东德城市莱比锡和西德城市奥斯纳布吕克是我们研究的主要地点，它们是全国性的难民住宿权力下放运动的先驱。2010 年代初，这两个城市的地方当局决定不将难民安置在大众住宿中心，而是选择通过便利他们获得私人住房来支持他们过上自主决定的生活。然而，这两个城市对 2015 年来德国寻求保护的人数不断增加做出了截然不同的反应。 基于实证观察，本文讨论了如何比较多样化和变化的主要研究问题的示范性解决方案。当地移民制度中难民住宿的做法和话语。要找到这个问题的答案，