当前位置: X-MOL 学术BioSocieties › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Embryo as ‘one of us’: Assisted reproductive technologies and the making of ‘homo juridicus’ in Italy
BioSocieties ( IF 1.3 ) Pub Date : 2019-02-25 , DOI: 10.1057/s41292-018-0139-7
Volha Parfenchyk

Biopower is widely seen as one of the main systems of social, political and biological controls in modern Western democracies. Its main purpose consists in the optimization and amelioration of the individual and collective “health, wealth and security” (Bennett in Technicians of human dignity: bodies, souls, and the making of intrinsic worth, Fordham University Press, New York, 2015 ). However, it has been acknowledged that biopower does not encompass all strategies presently performed over human life (Bennett in Technicians of human dignity: bodies, souls, and the making of intrinsic worth, Fordham University Press, New York, 2015 ). In this article, drawing on the Italian debate around Law 40/2004 and the constitution of in vitro-created embryos as moral and legal subjects, I seek to show the presence of another—“juridico-discursive” (Foucault in History of sexuality, Vintage Books, New York, 1980 )—form of power over human life which is conceptually and analytically distinct from the configurations of biopower. I argue, first, that the elements of the ‘analytics of biopolitics,’ namely, knowledge, power, and subjectivity, also structure and help implement political strategies in those cases where the sovereign power is at play, but they take a different shape than in biopolitics. Second, ‘juridico-discursive’ power has not been entirely displaced by governmentality and biopower, and ‘nature’ might not be the only legitimation of and limitation to the exercise of political power in liberal democracies.

中文翻译:

胚胎作为“我们中的一员”:辅助生殖技术和意大利“法律人”的形成

生物权力被广泛视为现代西方民主国家社会、政治和生物控制的主要系统之一。其主要目的在于优化和改善个人和集体的“健康、财富和安全”(Bennett in Technicians of human digm: bodys, souls, and the Making of Internal Values, Fordham University Press, New York, 2015)。然而,人们已经承认,生物能源并不包括目前在人类生活中执行的所有策略(Bennett in Technicians of human rights: body, souls, and the Making of Internal Values, Fordham University Press, New York, 2015)。在本文中,借鉴了意大利围绕第 40/2004 号法律和体外胚胎的构成作为道德和法律主体的辩论,我试图展示另一种——“法律-话语”(Foucault in History of Sexity,Vintage Books,纽约,1980 年)的存在——对人类生活的权力形式,它在概念和分析上与生物权力的配置不同。我认为,首先,“生命政治分析”的要素,即知识、权力和主体性,也在主权权力发挥作用的情况下构建和帮助实施政治战略,但它们的形状与在生命政治中。其次,“法律-话语”权力并没有完全被政府和生物权力所取代,“自然”可能不是自由民主国家行使政治权力的唯一合法性和限制。1980 年)——在概念上和分析上与生物权力的配置不同的对人类生活的权力形式。我认为,首先,“生命政治分析”的要素,即知识、权力和主体性,也在主权权力发挥作用的情况下构建和帮助实施政治战略,但它们的形状与在生物政治学中。其次,“法律-话语”权力并没有完全被政府和生物权力所取代,“自然”可能不是自由民主国家行使政治权力的唯一合法性和限制。1980 年)——在概念上和分析上与生物权力的配置不同的对人类生活的权力形式。我认为,首先,“生命政治分析”的要素,即知识、权力和主体性,也在主权权力发挥作用的情况下构建和帮助实施政治战略,但它们的形状与在生物政治学中。其次,“法律-话语”权力并没有完全被政府和生物权力所取代,“自然”可能不是自由民主国家行使政治权力的唯一合法性和限制。还可以在主权权力发挥作用的情况下构建和帮助实施政治战略,但它们的形式与生命政治不同。其次,“法律-话语”权力并没有完全被政府和生物权力所取代,“自然”可能不是自由民主国家行使政治权力的唯一合法性和限制。还可以在主权权力发挥作用的情况下构建和帮助实施政治战略,但它们的形式与生命政治不同。其次,“法律-话语”权力并没有完全被政府和生物权力所取代,“自然”可能不是自由民主国家行使政治权力的唯一合法性和限制。
更新日期:2019-02-25
down
wechat
bug