Although policy entrepreneurship is essential for fostering policy innovations to achieve sustainable development, the literature has conflated different types of entrepreneurship and disaggregated it using inconsistent terminology. We conceptualize entrepreneurship using a six‐stream variant of the multiple streams framework (MSF)—which addresses key limitations of the original MSF—to examine entrepreneurial activities in the case of the Jyotigram Yojana, a widely recognized policy innovation for managing the energy–water nexus in Gujarat, India. We find that whereas policy and political entrepreneurship no doubt played a significant role in coupling the streams and fostering this policy innovation, the process broker, program champion, and technology innovator were also important in policy formulation, implementation, and “success.” We conclude that the six‐stream variant of MSF is useful for identifying and distinguishing various types of entrepreneurship involved in policy innovation for sustainability.

中文翻译：

---

谁耦合了哪个流？印度古吉拉特邦能源水关系中的政策企业家精神和创新

尽管政策企业家精神对于促进政策创新以实现可持续发展至关重要，但文献将不同类型的企业家精神混为一谈，并使用不一致的术语将其分类。我们使用六流多流框架（MSF）的变体概念化（解决了原始MSF的主要局限性），以研究Jyotigram Yojana的创业活动，这是印度古吉拉特邦管理能源与水的关系的一项广泛认可的政策创新。我们发现，尽管政策和政治企业家精神无疑在耦合信息流和促进这种政策创新方面发挥了重要作用，但流程经纪人，计划冠军和技术创新者在政策制定，实施和“成功”中也很重要。我们得出的结论是，无国界医生的六阶段变体有助于识别和区分参与可持续性政策创新的各种类型的企业家精神。