The main aim of this paper is to tease out the historical and deeply rooted ethical standards, spirituality, and social values that have long supported the social service system in Kyrgyzstan, which, today, faces pressure to align with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. The data are based on an intervention conducted as part of the European Union‐Social Protection Systems programme in Kyrgyzstan between 2017 and 2018 where 30 university lecturers were part of. Interviews both to the Kyrgyz trainers with disabilities and to the trainees of the university lecturers as well as follow‐up survey conducted in 2019 form important part of data for this paper. We first investigate the conventional ethical standards, spiritual explanations, and social values related to disabilities within the Kyrgyz social protection system and social services. We elaborate on the Kyrgyz context of the societal ethics, spirituality, and values around disability in the Kyrgyz university education for social workers. Second, we analyse the transformation of the perception of disability among the university lecturers. We conclude this paper with a discussion on the negotiation between a charity‐based approach that reinforces the stigmatization of disability and a human rights‐based approach that promotes paradigm change, to contribute to global discourse of social change towards disability inclusion.

中文翻译：

---

吉尔吉斯斯坦大学社会工作教育中的残疾范式从耻辱转变为平等

本文的主要目的是找出长期支持吉尔吉斯斯坦社会服务体系的历史悠久且根深蒂固的道德标准，精神和社会价值观，而今天，吉尔吉斯斯坦面临着与《联合国人权公约》保持一致的压力。残疾人。数据基于2017年至2018年期间在吉尔吉斯斯坦进行的欧盟社会保护系统计划的一部分干预措施，其中30名大学讲师参与其中。对吉尔吉斯斯坦的残疾教练员和大学讲师的学员的访谈以及2019年进行的跟进调查都是本文数据的重要组成部分。我们首先研究常规的道德标准，精神解释，吉尔吉斯斯坦社会保护体系和社会服务中与残疾相关的社会价值观。我们在吉尔吉斯斯坦针对社会工作者的大学教育中，详细阐述了吉尔吉斯斯坦的社会道德，灵性和残疾价值观。其次，我们分析了大学讲师对残疾观念的转变。在本文的结尾，我们讨论了一种基于慈善的方法和一种基于人权的方法之间的谈判，该方法加强了对残疾的污名化，而人权方法则促进了范式的改变，从而促进了社会变革对残疾人纳入的讨论。我们分析了大学讲师对残疾观念的转变。在本文的结尾，我们讨论了一种基于慈善的方法和一种基于人权的方法之间的谈判，该方法加强了对残疾的污名化，而人权方法则促进了范式的改变，从而促进了社会变革对残疾人纳入的讨论。我们分析了大学讲师对残疾观念的转变。在本文的结尾，我们讨论了一种基于慈善的方法和一种基于人权的方法之间的谈判，该方法加强了对残疾的污名化，而人权方法则促进了范式的改变，从而促进了社会变革对残疾人纳入的讨论。