In recent decades, public management has been restructured worldwide for greater efficiency and innovation based on entrepreneurship‐driven models such as Reinventing Governance, New Public Management, and post‐NPM frameworks. The primary intent of these business‐like models is instilling entrepreneurship, which would encourage risk‐taking innovation, managerial autonomy, performance orientation, and customer choice. Such entrepreneurial orientation is embedded in organizational‐managerial reforms related to human resource management, budgeting framework, performance benchmarking, and so on. These entrepreneurship‐driven reforms have significant impacts on administrative structure, procedures, and norms affecting the process of public sector accountability. In line with such global trends, most countries in Southeast Asia have embraced some of these pro‐market business‐type reforms in public management to enhance its entrepreneurship, innovation, and competition, which have implications for managerial control, neutrality, regulation, and integrity required for public accountability. This article explores these entrepreneurship‐driven reforms in the region and evaluates their critical implications for the long‐established institutions, structures, and procedures of public accountability.

中文翻译：

---

企业家精神驱动的东南亚公共管理改革：对公共问责制的重大影响

近几十年来，基于企业家精神驱动的模型（如“重塑治理”，“新公共管理”和NPM后框架），公共管理已在全球进行重组，以提高效率和创新。这些类似于业务的模型的主要目的是灌输企业家精神，这将鼓励冒险创新，管理自主权，绩效导向和客户选择。这种企业家取向被嵌入与人力资源管理，预算框架，绩效基准等相关的组织管理改革中。这些由企业家精神驱动的改革对影响公共部门问责制的行政结构，程序和规范产生了重大影响。顺应这种全球趋势，东南亚大多数国家/地区已经在公共管理中采纳了一些亲市场业务类型的改革，以增强其企业家精神，创新和竞争能力，这对公共问责制所需的管理控制，中立性，法规和廉正产生了影响。本文探讨了该地区企业家精神驱动的改革，并评估了其对历史悠久的机构，结构和公共问责程序的重要影响。