As a polyvocal discipline that integrates studies of law in society, socio‐legal studies should have no problem accommodating civil liberties and human rights. Numerous methodologies and frameworks present themselves as illuminating, troubling, and critiquing conceptions and experiences of rights. Legal analysis of human rights is nevertheless often abstract and highly technical. But what if socio‐legal analyses of rights were not available? What would be lacking? Using a personal situated methodological approach, I explore the Journal of Law and Society's back catalogue to reflect on what civil liberties and human rights might be without socio‐legal studies.

中文翻译：

---

关于矿山，采矿和想象：没有社会的权利？

作为将法律研究融入社会的多学科学科，社会法律研究应不存在与公民自由和人权相适应的问题。许多方法论和框架以启发，困扰和批判权利的观念和经验的方式呈现自己。但是，对人权的法律分析通常是抽象的和高度技术性的。但是，如果没有权利的社会法律分析，该怎么办？会缺少什么？我使用个人处境方法论方法，探索了《法律与社会杂志》的背景目录，以反思没有社会法律研究可能会带来哪些公民自由和人权。