As Callahan (2018, p. 306) states, “whether a real issue of ethical concern or a moral panic, self-plagiarism has captured the attention of authors, editors, publishers, and plagiarism-detection software companies,” and has led to fierce debates on the judgment of fair reuse of one’s own work. This editorial will revisit these debates and explain the views and expectations of the Project Management Journal^® (PMJ). This is part of a series of editorials designed to guide future submissions to PMJ^® and inform project scholars about relevant topics related to the craft of research. Here, we discuss the concept of self-plagiarism and its institutionalization. We, the editorial board of PMJ, then propose the four principles we will use to judge self-plagiarism: ownership, honesty, originality, and academic citizenship. These principles build on our discussions about plagiarism (Geraldi, 2021). We encourage authors, reviewers, and readers to engage with the principles to help us in the prevention of and response to cases of self-plagiarism.

中文翻译：

---

项目研究中的自我lag窃：呼吁采取行动与反思

正如Callahan（2018，p.306）指出的那样，“无论是真正的道德问题还是道德上的恐慌，自我-窃都引起了作者，编辑，出版者和窃检测软件公司的关注，”关于公正地重用自己的作品的辩论激烈。这篇社论将重新这些争论和解释的意见和期望项目管理杂志^®（PMJ）。这是一系列旨在引导未来提交社论的一部分PMJ ^®并告知项目的学者约有关的研究工艺相关的主题。在这里，我们讨论了自我pla窃的概念及其制度化。我们，PMJ编辑部，然后提出我们将用来判断self窃的四个原则：所有权，诚实，原创性和学术公民身份。这些原则基于我们对窃的讨论（Geraldi，2021年）。我们鼓励作者，审稿人和读者遵循这些原则，以帮助我们预防和应对self窃案件。